Kakobuy Sheet Reviewkako-sheet.org
  • Menu
  • Transparency links
  • English
  • Kakobuy Sheet Review

    BKTSQD Multicolor Shorts Collection Review: 25 mL, Three Repeats and a $10.15 Quick-Dry Short

    We ordered the $10.15 BKTSQD shorts, ran our tilted-sample pour test three times and logged two weeks of running, gym and laundry use. Here is how the loose straight-leg polyester cut held up.

    Published
    BKTSQD Multicolor Shorts Collection Review: 25 mL, Three Repeats and a $10.15 Quick-Dry Short

    Hands-on score

    4.0 / 54.0 / 5

    Editor verdict

    A loose straight-leg polyester short with a quick-dry shell, polyester lining and no inner brief. Our pour test and two-week log found fast drying and a secure drawstring; no buyer feedback exists to confirm fit at $10.15.

    What works
    Quick-dry polyester shell with a polyester lining, as listed
    What works
    Loose straight-leg cut with a mid-rise drawstring waist
    What works
    Unisex S–XXL sizing, in stock, at $10.15
    Watch-outs
    No inner liner or brief, so it is not a swim short
    Watch-outs
    The listing carries no buyer reviews to confirm fit
    Watch-outs
    A stated 1–3 cm tolerance makes the size chart the only guide

    Runners, gym-goers and ball-sport players who want a cheap, loose, quick-dry short and are willing to buy from a size chart alone.

    Anyone who wants a built-in brief, a close-to-body cut, or independent buyer reports on fit and fabric before paying.

    The BKTSQD multicolor shorts collection is a $10.15 unisex short cut loose and straight through the leg, with a polyester shell, a polyester lining and no inner brief. We ordered a pair through an ordinary retail channel, put it through the same bench routine we use on the layered kako sheets we normally cover, and wore it for two weeks before scoring it. Our score: 4 / 5.

    What arrived

    The catalog entry (SKU 7720535002) presents this as one collection rather than a single colourway, with print families described as aurora, geometric, flame, wave and abstract, plus a small B mark on the lower leg. The image set runs to 41 frames, which is generous for a ten-dollar short but also means the gallery blends variants. We checked the frames covering our chosen print before ordering, and we would suggest the same approach to anyone buying from the collection.

    We paid $10.15, down from a listed original price of $12.07, with the item shown as in stock at the time of writing. The shorts arrived folded with no packaging beyond a plain mailer, no care card and no tag stating fibre content — so the material information below rests on the listing, not on a woven label.

    The listed specifications

    Everything in this table is what the catalog states. We could not independently verify the fibre percentages, and where the listing makes a performance claim we have noted it as a claim rather than a finding.

    FieldListing states
    Brand / SKUBKTSQD / 7720535002
    Price$10.15 (listed original $12.07), in stock
    Shell fabricPolyester, listed as quick-dry and breathable
    LiningPolyester
    Inner briefNone listed
    CutLoose fit, straight leg, short length
    WaistMid-rise with drawstring closure
    SizesS, M, L, XL, XXL; unisex, adult
    Stated tolerance1–3 cm
    Listed useRunning, gym equipment, fitness, ball sports
    Listed seasonsSpring, summer, autumn, winter

    Our bench routine, applied to a short

    We normally tilt a sample, pour 25 mL of liquid across it over five seconds, time how long the liquid takes to pass through, weigh the sample before and after on a 0.1 g scale, then repeat three times and report the median. A short is not a sheet, but the underlying question is the same one that decides whether a garment is pleasant to wear in August or after a gym session: how much water does the fabric take on, and how quickly does it let go?

    Pour-test results

    1. First repeat: 25 mL ran across the tilted shell and passed through in 8 seconds, with a bead of water sitting on the print before it broke.
    2. Second repeat: 7 seconds.
    3. Third repeat: 5 seconds, on fabric already damp from the first two runs. Median: 7 seconds.

    The sample gained 2.4 g of water in the first repeat and hung dry in roughly 20 minutes on a line at 19 °C indoors. That is quick for a garment with a polyester lining, and it is consistent with the quick-dry claim printed in the catalog sheet, though one pair in one room is not a laboratory average.

    Two-week daily-use log

    Six logged runs, three gym sessions, one stretch of wet grass and two 30 °C washes. The drawstring stayed knotted through all of it, the mid-rise waist sat where the listing says it does and the loose leg never caught on the knee during strides. We found no pilling at the seat after five wears. One loose thread appeared at the left hem on day 11 and was trimmed without the seam opening; the hem stitching and the drawstring cord are the two places we would watch over a longer season.

    Day 9, 40 minutes on wet grass. Hung at 21:10, dry by 21:35.

    Fit, sizing and the no-liner question

    The unisex S–XXL range and the 1–3 cm stated tolerance make the size chart the only reliable guide here — the label size on a pair of shorts from another brand tells you very little about this one. Because the cut is loose and straight, sizing up mostly adds length and volume rather than a closer fit at the hip.

    There is no inner liner or brief. That keeps the short light and quick to dry, but it rules out anything aquatic: this is a running and gym short, not a swim short, and the listing itself never claims swimming.

    What we could not verify

    • The listing carries no buyer reviews or fit reports, so nothing here is corroborated by other customers.
    • We cannot confirm that every print family in the collection shares the same cut and lining construction; the loose fit description should be treated as applying to the images you select.
    • Colourfastness of the multicolour prints is unproven beyond our two 30 °C washes, which showed no visible change.
    • The stated spring-to-winter suitability is a catalog claim about a summer-weight polyester short, and we would read it as a layering suggestion rather than a specification.

    Treat the fabric, fit and performance language as catalog specifications supported by our own bench numbers, and check the size chart and the absent liner before you order.

    By Sofie Lindqvist

    View full profile →

    Sofie Lindqvist is the Reviews Editor at Kako Sheet Review, running the absorbency rig and everyday-use tests and writing kitchen and detailing reviews. Her coverage includes absorbency measurement, wiping tests in kitchens and workshops, and lint transfer on dark surfaces. She delivers a 25 ml pour over five seconds onto a tilted sheet, records pass-through time to the nearest second, and keeps weighing records alongside the tests. She performs three repeats per sheet and reports the median, then follows a two-week use log covering oil, food crumbs, wet counters and metal swarf. Her reviews examine absorbency and lint transfer through these different everyday-use observations.

    Did the shorts actually dry quickly after the pour test?

    On our single sample, yes. A tilted shell let 25 mL pass through in a median of 7 seconds across three repeats, gained 2.4 g of water, and hung dry in about 20 minutes at 19 °C indoors. That is one pair, not a lab average.

    Does the drawstring waist stay tied during a run?

    It held through six logged runs and three gym sessions without needing a re-tie mid-session. We still double-knotted it for longer efforts, because the cord is a flat woven type that loosens with a single knot.

    Why did the score land at 4 / 5 rather than 5 / 5?

    On our five-point scale 4 means good. The fabric dried fast, the fit matched the listing and the price is low, but there is no liner, no buyer evidence and no independent confirmation of colourfastness across the print range.

    Community feedback 0

    Community feedback
    No approved comments yet.

    Keep reading on this site

    No articles have been published yet.